David Meerman Scott, an online leader, strategist, and author of five marketing books formulated a list of 5 different guidelines for ethical Social Media Marketing. The list below was gathered from this post from Marcom Professional.
1. Transparency– If you aren’t open with your consumer on exactly who you are, it can come back to bite you. Consumer’s don’t like to be lied to and with social media, it could be easy to hide your identity. Showing the real person behind the ideas coming from the computer screen is key.
2. Privacy– If you’re given inside information, don’t let the whole world know through social media. Once a secret’s let out… a whole campaign could be ruined!
3. Disclosure– Let people know truthful information that they may find trouble with in the future.
4. Truthfulness– Always, always, always tell the truth. Don’t fabricate or elaborate anything.
5. Credit– Give recognition to those who help out or contribute to your ideas. Giving others credit makes your ideas seem more like a team rather than a single opinion. Teamwork makes the dream work.
To give you more insight on David Meerman Scott, I’ve posted a video where he explains his path into social media.
This week in our public relations class, we learned all about public relations and the law. After reading this blog post about 3M from Marcom Professional, I understood the need for social media ethics. In this post, the author David Meerman Scott, explained that as a joke, a man named Scott Ableman and his colleagues covered their friend’s car in 4,000 colored post-its from 3M. The photos were viral and were viewed by millions on Flickr. Because of all of the free publicity that it attracted, 3M decided to use it in its back to school campaign- without giving credit to Ableman. 3M mimicked the idea, took their own pictures, and used them in their back to school marketing campaign. 3M should have paid Ableman and his colleagues or at least put their names somewhere on the marketing campaign to give them credit. As the David, put it… This campaign turned a “World Wide Rave” into a “World Wide Rant” .
For my public relations class, we were asked to look at major brands on Facebook. I chose to look up popular brands that make products that many Clemson University students wear and use. The three brands that I looked up were: The North Face, Patagonia, and Mountain Hardware. Out of all three, Mountain Hardware’s page was the least put together.
Patagonia’s Facebook page has over 6,500 fans. On its wall, Patagonia shares news stories about earthy subjects that are geared more towards their clientele. Fans of Patagonia write mostly positive feedback on its wall. Under it’s INFO tab, Patagonia lists its Web sites, background information, and the products that it produces. In its PHOTOS box, there are outdoorsy pictures of nature. Interestingly enough, there are very few pictures posted that include the Patagonia label. Patagonia has a YOUTUBE tab where it features outdoor activities that would be interesting to their fans.
The North Face fan wall is similar to Patagonia’s except it has five times more fans than Patagonia’s. The North Face fan wall shares Facebook notes about a climbing excursion of a 5 man team. They also have fans that write positive feedback and promote events that will be happening in stores that carry North Face products. Under it’s INFO tab, The North Face fan page has multiple Web site and the products that they sell. With the other tabs, The North Face fan page is very similar to the Patagonia page, but they do not have a YOUTUBE tab. In addition to the regular tabs, they have an EVENTS tab that lists the upcoming outdoor activities that The North Face is hosting.
The last fan page that I looked at was Mountain Hardware. The fan page has less than 300 members and only has 3 tabs to explore the site with. A few fans have written on their wall, however there have been no posted articles or upcoming events by Mountain Hardware. The information in the INFO tab lists one Web site and the major designers and their backgrounds. There are few photos that are under their PHOTO tab. This fan page is the worst out of all three because of its lack of ingenuity and information. The site isn’t geared towards it’s fans and doesn’t try to connect on a personal level.
I came across a Tweet from Katrina Meidanis that Careerealism.com was offering free link love. A couple of weeks ago in my public relations class, we discussed the importance of our blogs being linked to other blogs. Kelly Jones, an SEO specialist explained a lot of different factors that enhanced the popularity of our blogs. You only have to take 3 simple steps in order to have Careerealism.com give your blog a little link love!
I recently started following Kara Smith on Twitter and reading her blog, Karasma Media. I came across one of her posts this past week about how Twitter is effecting our legal system. In her post, Kara talks about how jurors are starting to tweet and sending updates about trials as the trials are still in session. That court case was considered a mistrial. She also talks about how a juror “Google Searched” a defendant during a trial. With all of this new technology and social media, secrets that once were kept hidden can now be found within a matter of seconds. Do you think that something needs to be done about social media in relation to our legal system?
For my stakeholder comm class, we were asked to look at 15 different well known companies and analyze their efforts on Twitter. We were asked to look at what they tweet, how often they tweet, who do they follow, and the transparency of the Twitter account. Out of all of the brands, I think that the Twitter account @SharpieSusan was one of the most effective. @SharpieSusan was very transparent. In her short bio, she briefly explains her goal of the Twitter account: Leading the charge on PRSM (public relations social media) at Sharpie. Her following/followers ratio only differs by 100.
She tweets feedback about Sharpie to people who tweet her.
She also tweets about Sharpie ideas and products.
While most of her tweets are about Sharpie, what makes her seem more likable and personable are her tweets that don’t mention the brand.
I think that with her diverse tweets, good ratio of followers/following and transparency, @SharpieSusan is effectively using her Twitter account.
After reading Being Cheryl’s post about Capital University’s new campaign called “What Will You Do”, I HAD to check it out. This new campaign lets students post pictures, notes, and videos of things that they plan to do in the future. After visiting the Web site to learn more, I realized that a campaign like this one really helps show the ambitions and diversity of students at Capital University. The video posted at the top of the “What Will You Do” page is only a couple of minutes long and shows quick snippets of some students’ plans, goals, and dreams for the future. Some “What Will You Do’s” are as simple studying for a test or attending a meeting while others are more complex like graduating from Capital University at the top of the class. The site also has a place where a viewer can click to see the Capital University homepage to learn more about the institution. I think this campaign is really interesting because it makes Capital University stand out. The posts, pictures, and videos of the students help give the university a more personal touch.
I think that Clemson University should try something like this. By asking a diverse group of students what they plan to do in the future, I think it will help give the Clemson University site a more personal touch. When looking on the Clemson homepage, there are headlines from recent news and a calendar of upcoming university events. However, I think if a link to a site similar to Capital University’s was shown, it would help high school seniors get a better feel for the kind of students that attend Clemson. It may even help convince some to become Tigers!
Whew! Clemson is finally on Spring Break after a hectic week of tests, papers, and projects. I had taken a few days off of blogging and twittering, but I’m back on board! While reading through my list of blogs, I came across the TwiTip blog which posts any and everything about Twitter. A particular post that I found very interesting was about 10 new Twitter tools.
The tool that really caught my eye was Tweet2Tweet. Tweet2Tweet allows you to see the messages and conversations between two people. Sometimes when two classmates of mine are conversing over Twitter about a class assignment, it is hard to go back through messages to figure out what they were saying. With Tweet2Tweet, it’s much easier and faster to figure out what their conversation consists of.
I have recently come across David Lano’s Blog and have been subscribing to it on my Google Reader. Today, I read his blog that highlighted the differences between searching the Internet through Google and searching through Twitter Search.
The main point of his post was that with Google, you search to find out about a certain subject. With Twitter Search, you search to find out how a certain subject is being talked about at that particular moment. We’ve tried using Twitter Search in my Stakeholder Comm class and have found it helpful while looking for internship advice and finding PRo’s to follow. However, I have never even thought to search other things that I’m interested in to see the opinions of the Twitterverse.
An example that David uses is wanting to see what people are saying about the TV show “24”. If he were to Google “24”, he may find more factual information than opinionated. However, if he Twitter Searches “24”, he will find quick opinions of people in chronological order.
To try it out for myself, I Googled searched “The Bachelor”, my recent obsession over the past 5 weeks. The first few sites that appeared were informational Web sites about the actual show and biographies about the most recent bachelor, Jason. After Twitter Searching “The Bachelor”, I was able to read tweets about what people thought about how the show ended. The tweets that appeared when searching “The Bachelor” also showed peoples’ opinions of Jason and the decisions that he made.