World Wide Raves vs. World Wide Rants

This week in our public relations class, we learned all about public relations and the law.  After reading this blog post  about 3M from Marcom Professional, I understood the need for social media ethics.  In this post, the author David Meerman Scott, explained that as a joke, a man named Scott Ableman and his colleagues covered their friend’s car in 4,000 colored post-its from 3M.  The photos were viral and were viewed by millions on Flickr.  Because of all of the free publicity that it attracted, 3M decided to use it in its back to school campaign- without giving credit to Ableman.  3M mimicked the idea, took their own pictures, and used them in their back to school marketing campaign.  3M should have paid Ableman and his colleagues or at least put their names somewhere on the marketing campaign to give them credit.  As the David, put it… This campaign turned a “World Wide Rave” into a “World Wide Rant” .

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “World Wide Raves vs. World Wide Rants

  1. I read that exact same article about the 3M disaster. It’s hard to believe that 3M just had to simply give Ableman credit and a modest fee (I believe the other article said around $2000); and 3M could have had a success like Mentos and Diet Coke. The concept of David Meerman Scott’s of World Wide Raves and World Wide Rants is really interesting. The terms really fit the situations social media can create.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s